User:Kalearose.fajardo/Origin of transfer/Yutong Wu Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Kalearose.fajardo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Kalearose.fajardo/Origin_of_transfer&veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template&redirect=no
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Origin of transfer

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Answers to General Questions:

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Yes, everything in the article relevant to the article topic. There isn't anything that distracted me.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is neutral and there are't any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, there aren't viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * I have checked the citations and the links work. The source supports the claims in the article.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Yes, it is. The information comes from research articles. In addition, these are neutral sources.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * No, there isn't any information out of date. And there isn't anything missing that should be added.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Yes, it is. The information comes from research articles. In addition, these are neutral sources.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * No, there isn't any information out of date. And there isn't anything missing that should be added.
 * No, there isn't any information out of date. And there isn't anything missing that should be added.

Some Specific Suggestions:

 * I think it would be good to add the link to the wikipedia article titled "relaxosome." Since I wasn't familiar with this concept and I need to look this concept up to understand your article of origin of transfer. I have seen that there is a wikipedia article about relaxosome, so I think it would be a good idea to help the readers understand your article better if you simply create a link to this existing article about relaxosome.
 * In addition, I think it would be good to add more to the article you are working with based on the current version you have. I think it would be good to talk about some applications of your concept of origin of transfer and how people might use in for other purposes, if there are any. I think it would also be good to write about broader concepts, such as applications or history (how this concept was discovered).
 * I think you did a great job on editing!
 * I think you did a great job on editing!
 * I think you did a great job on editing!