User:Kaleasantoyo/Florence Garvin/Sophia-zaragoza Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kaleasantoyo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kaleasantoyo/Florence_Garvin?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kaleasantoyo/Florence_Garvin?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

It appears that the lead has not been updated nor reflects any new content. The Lead does however have an introductory sentence that clearly states what/who the article will be discussing. The lead does not have a brief description about the topics discussed, but does have strong topic sentences that discuss what each paragraph will discuss. The Lead is concise and to the point.

It is unclear what content has been added, if any was added.

The content is neutral. There are many statements where they are stating Florence Garvin's accomplishments, but they appear unbiased. However, it can also seem a little as if she is being overrepresented, which may lead the reader to be a little bit persuaded.

The content appears to be backup and reliable. Some of the references do not have the websites linked to check if they are reliable or not.