User:Kaleighjohnson14/sandbox

Article Evaluation

This article is called "outline of wikipedia"

It really goes into detail about who what when where and why wikipedia was created. If you had any questions about wikipedia you could definitely use this article as a guide for your research. One thing that distracted me was where it talks about "politics of wikipedia." I wasn't exactly sure what that was supposed to mean but i read more into it and it helped me get an idea of what they were talking about. There is definitely a lot of irrelevant info in this article. The latest source added on here was from 2013 so I am almost positive there is stuff that could be updated on this article. It talks about the history of wikipedia, the general idea of wikipedia, and goes into greater detail about wikipedia. Considering this article is titled, "outline of wikipedia," there might be too much detail about wikipedia in this article. This article seems like it doesn't have any negatives about wikipedia so it could be a little biased. I clicked multiple sources and a couple didn't work but most of them did. Some said "sorry the page you were looking for wasn't found" so that was not very helpful. A lot of the sources had pros about wikipedia, and languages of wikipedia etc. They seemed pretty reliable to me. They gave great detail and weren't too out dated. When visiting the talk page, it just shows how this article is an outline and gives more detail about what that is. There isn't much conversation on this page. It describes that this article is a c class article and more info about what a c class article is. A c class article on the wikipedia scale means there is too much info on the topic and a lot of it is irrelevant. This article is rated "high importance" which obviously means it is important. This article is apart of wikiproject outlines. This article covers mostly what we have learned in class but goes into much more detail.