User:Kalemicrobiology/Thiodictyon syntrophicum/Vide351 Peer Review

Peer review
Focusing on the one strain that has been isolated while also briefly addressing that other strains exist helps the article feel informative but also up to change. If it hadn't been addressed that other strains existed, I think the article might seem too fixated but mentioning that other strains exist help with the credibility (I don't know if that makes sense, but I guess just it's nice to show that other strains exist).

Splitting this up into four different sections helps with the overall flow of the article but maybe the "carbon fixation" and "sulfur cycling" could be included as sub-headings on "strain Cad16" instead of their own headings.

The fact the strain was isolated from Lake Cadagno is mentioned maybe a little too much: maybe instead of saying it every time, just refer to "the strain of Cad16 previously isolated" or something could help with flow.

Overall I think this is a good start and the format of how you set it up should help with the flow.