User:Kalista Malette/Antiporter/EndlessSummer19 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Kalista Malette
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Kalista Malette/sandbox

Lead evaluation
The Lead has an introductory sentence that describes the topic of the article. The Lead is concise but does not include a description of the major sections of the article or an update that reviews the section that was added.

Content evaluation
The content added is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date. Maybe add more content to the article.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content added is in a neutral tone. The content added isn't biased or persuading readers to favor a position.

Sources and references evaluation
All new content has reliable sources. The sources are current and are thorough. The links to these sources work.

Organization evaluation
The content added is well-written. It is scientific and easy to read. The content is well organized and doesn't have any spelling or grammatical errors.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The content has improved the quality of the original article making it seem more complete than before. The content added can be improved by adding a picture to help readers visualize how an Antiporter transports ions or molecules. The organization of the draft makes it easy to read and has a logical flow.