User:KalleyO/Forensic Science/Et8872rp Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

KalleyO


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KalleyO/Forensic_Science?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Forensic science

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? This is an interesting new lead. I think it would fit well with this article

Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections and an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? It's just the name of the lead. There is no intro to what it is.

Body:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? The content added is relevant and easy to understand

Is the content added up-to-date? It is easy to read and is written in a neutral tone

Source:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, the source is cited right and works

Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Yes, everything written here is backed by the source

Are the sources current? Yes, its within 5 years

Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? There are 4 authors in this academic article. There is an authors page which gives a brief background of them.

Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) There was not much that I could find with figuring out whether police should use Genetic Genealogy Database, but there are a few where it is used in missing persons cases.

Organization:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is well written, easy to read, and there are no grammatical errors.