User:Kambjacks/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Dental public health

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I am a pre-dental student and I am currently doing research over oral health and the factors that are involved. Dental public health is relevant because it is very important that the public is educated on how to maintain oral health to prevent diseases and other medical problems.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is sufficient because it introduces the article's topic and the subtopics that are explained in more detail further down. It is concise and to-the-point, not overly detailed. All of the content in the article is relevant to the topic. The content within the article seems up to date, however, a timeline section that provides an overview of major events and what year they occurred stops at 1996, and I believe it would be beneficial to include entries that highlight modern events. The article's tone is neutral and does not persuade, it is educational. The links to the citations work and they are credible sources. Most of the citations come from credible journals and primary sources that are educational. The article is well-organized and easy to follow. There are a few images, but I believe more informational images would be beneficial. The article is part of the Wikiproject Health and fitness and it is supported by the Wikiproject Dentistry. It is rated C-class. The conversations on the talk-page were from a couple years ago and the issues have been improved. The article is a good overview, but I believe more information could be included.