User:KameronSch/Ecovillage/Nomymelon Peer Review

General info
KameronSch
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:KameronSch/Ecovillage - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ecovillage - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead section has been updated to reflect new content added by Kameron, although they're still considering adding more information to summarize the main sections. The introductory sentence is concise and clear on the definition of an ecovillage and its main objective. The lead section does provide brief descriptions of the body paragraphs, but not all of them (i.e. Governance). The lead section is little confusing only because it's overly detailed. ￼

The content added is very relevant to the topic, and often times more concise and straight to the point. I see the editor made notes to update information and fact check examples. There are proposed sections that haven't been deciphered yet. The article does deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps, it talks about the women's council in the Tamera community and how they challenge patriarchal norms.

The content is seemingly neutral, and I didn't detect any biases. I think the viewpoints in governance may be overrepresented and could be explained in fewer sentences. The quality of the information is very good though. I don't think the information added is trying to sway me in any direction, just simply inform me of the complexities within ecovillages. ￼

The sources are current, thorough, and represent a diverse spectrum of authors. The new content is backed up by reliable source information. The last paragraph of governance only has one citation though, so it might be important to add some other ones. I checked all of the links, and they work perfectly.

No images were added in the sandbox draft, but I noticed the original article has quite a few already. The content added has definitely improved the overall quality of the article. I like the flow of the editor's writing and how they provide examples after explaining aspects of ecovillages. I think the content can be improved in the lead and governance section by being a bit more precise. I'm curious to see what other sections they choose to write about because I found the concept of these villages to be very interesting. I also recommend maybe including the world or outside governance view of ecovillages.