User:KameronSch/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
4Ocean - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this Wikipedia article because it is a company I am familiar with, and it is rated as a start-class on the content assessment scale. My preliminary impression of it is that is a very short article with not a lot of information. I believe there could use more information added to this article to add more substantial content.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is weak and provides some description of topics that aren't included in any of the sections. The article content is relevant to the topic, but the included content is sparce and could include missing content. The 4Ocean article doesn't deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. There is one sentence that's tone is written in a way that isn't neutral. The article contains reliable citations, and each claim does have a citation. There may be more up to date sources, the most recent source is from 2019. This page could also use more images, all it includes is the company's logo. The talk discussion page had interesting conversations questioning this page's efficacy since it sounded like it was written as an advertisement. It is rated as a start-class article and is an interest to the Environment, Companies, Florida WikiProjects. This article can be improved by adding missing content, strengthening the lead section, adding images, correct sentence to a neutral tone and up to date sources.