User:Kanafair/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Miranda (The Tempest)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article to evaluate as I was interested in the role Miranda has in The Tempest. She has a great influence over other characters in this play, which contributes to the plot of the play.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

- neutral points of view, when opinions stated, it is begins as "critics claim"

-yes

-yes

-yes

Content

- after going through a few articles, they seem relevant

- up to date

- gender role section does not really cover Miranda's sexuality and a lot of what is said about her is that she is subservient. Her independent nature should be explored

- no content is misplaced

- I do not believe so

Tone and Balance

- yes

- miranda's independence as a character is not really described

- no

-yes

-no, it is fairly neutral

Sources and Resources

- yes

- yes

- yes

- yes

- not any that are legitimate sources to use for wikipedia

- I have tried several, they work fine

Organization and writing quality

- yes

- no

- yes

Images and Media

- yes

- yes clear description and appropriate photos

- yes

- yes

Talk page discussion

- no conversation, the edits are few and far inbewtween

- C class, there was one WikiProject years ago

- no information

Overall impressions

- overall pretty solid

- clear, unbiased, covers main topics surrounding Miranda

- article can be improved by expanding on Miranda's sexuality and independence as a character

- it is well developed