User:Kangaboo/Outreach/Nicole Lizbeth Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kangaboo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kangaboo/Outreach?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Outreach

Evaluate the drafted changes
Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article?

The contribution adds to the article by explaining the limitations of outreach practices as a remedy for homelessness. It neutrally does this, making it a strong argument. However, I feel it only scratches at the surface of it being a band-aid solution and can further contribute to the article by doing both a limitations and benefits section. What needs improvement or why it cannot address all the issues of homelessness.

'''What are the strengths of the added content? How can it be improved?'''

The stat is given at the end; touching on how many individuals engaged with these services allows the reader to understand its limitations. Aside from what I mentioned above, I think a good way to elaborate will be to talk about the barriers to access these programs, as that seems to be why people do not get the opportunity to benefit from them.

Is the content well organized?

The content is concise and well organized. I think it is placed in a good place in the article (at the end), and the stat was cited correctly.

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased?

None of the claims appear heavily biased. On the contrary, it does an excellent job at remaining neutral.