User:Kannbee/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Astral spirit

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen to evaluate this article because I have an interest in it and would like to understand and learn more about the topic.

Evaluate the article
The article title was acceptable, however, I do not feel that there was really a lead section. The article seemed to just start off listing information right away and in a detailed paragraph. The information was adequate and up-to-date and did not include any of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

For the most part, the article was easy to read and concise. I did not notice any grammatical errors, however, the author did not include any type of engaging media. As for the talk page, there was only one comment which consisted of someone suggesting an edit to the end of the article.

Overall, the article was free of grammatical errors and seemed to portray the topic decently. However, when stating some facts, I felt there could have been more detail about them. It seemed the author would skip from different fact to fact. There were no visual aspects to the article, either, which would help for people who are visual learners. I do not believe the article is complete as I feel there could be much more description added and detail added to each statement or fact that was stated.