User:Kaoalyson/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Seafood Watch

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article because Seafood Watch is not a program I was familiar with and wanted to learn more. Furthermore, it is important to me on a personal level as seafood is the only form of meat I consume.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section: The lead section is concise, yet detailed. It contains all of the essential aspects of a lead; a brief description and an obvious definition.

Content : There are only two sub sections; Sustainable Seafood list and Industry Criticism. Both sections are relevant and up to date. I think that the Sustainable Seafood list section could be split into multiple sections.

Tone and Balance: The tone and balance is neutral.

Sources and References: There is a lack of sources for the "Industry Criticism" section.

Organization and Writing Quality: The organization is good. Some sections could be split. the writing quality is good.

Images and Media: There is one image of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch logo. More media could be added, such as images of labels for sustainable seafood.

Talk Page: The most recent activity on the talk page comes from May 2019 there are a few suggestions for citations and organization.

Overall Impressions: This is a strong article. With additional citations, reorganization, and possible expansion on some topics it could become stronger.