User:Kaosuna/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Article: Nurse practitioner


 * Evaluating content
 * Everything in the article was relevant to the article topic; there was nothing notable that I found distracting
 * All the information is relatively up to date; the most recent statistcs seems to be from 2016.
 * Providing more recent statistics could improve the content and usefulness of the article
 * Evaluating tone
 * The tone of the article seems informative and neutral; the claim that seems somewhat biased toward a particular position is the claim concerning NP training. NP training only covers basic disease prevention and health promotion and lacks the depth required to recognize more complex cases which involve multiple symptoms associated with more complicated or serious cases seems to devalue the training that NPs. NPs do receive extensive training and a high education and usually hold a masters or doctorate degree. NPs work alongside doctors and, in some states, NPs can have their own practices without the supervision of a physician.
 * There don't seem to be viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented
 * Evaluating sources
 * When checking the citations, the links worked and the sources supported the claims in the article.
 * Each fact is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference and the information is from neutral sources.
 * Checking the talk page
 * There was a conversations about the article seeming "Americacentric" and lacking a worldwide view; however, this is due to the lack of information about NPs around the world in 2006, when the article was first published. The article now seems to include information about NPs in other countries and the article has more of a worldwide view of NPs.
 * There were a conversation about clarifying if NPs can prescribe in all 44 vs 50 states due to source discrepancy. It was clarified that NPs can prescribe in all 50 states.
 * There was a conversation about plagiarism in which some of the text seems to be verbatim from a particular website which was not cited.
 * There were conversations regarding increasing the information about what level healthcare provider they are, the scope of practice for NPs and how it differs from a physician's.
 * There was a conversation about the recommendation for a good page containing informative information regarding NPs which could help prospective students better understand the profession.
 * There was a conversation about the flow of information in a particular section skipping around which caused confusion; a suggestion for a better flow was made. There were suggestions about minor edits, spell check as well as rephrasing.
 * There were conversations about quality of content issues. The page seemed to provide more of an overview, summation, or reflection instead of specifics pertaining to the perfusion.
 * There was also a conversation regarding removing an image because did did not effectively illustrate the concept of a NP.
 * There was a conversation critiquing a section of the article in that it goes "too far for what credible sources offer" and lacked citation . The section may have seemed too subjective and speculative; however, the article has been updated and more credible sources have been cited and the tone is more informative.
 * This article is rated B-class; low-, mid-, and high-importance; it is of interest to the following WikiProjects: WikiProject Nursing, WikiProject Medicine, and WikiProject Occupations.
 * In class, we touched on women in STEM and also looked at women in color in STEM. Wikipedia does not discuses women or women of color in regards to NPs.

Article 1: Elizabeth Robertson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Robertson

•	This proposed modified article meets topic requirements in that it this article is about a female scientist which involves gender that is linked to oppression and involves science.

•	This proposed modified article meets scope-of-work requirements in that I could expand the article 5-fold because it is presently very short and brief. The summary at the top of the article is comprised on only three sentences. The article is made up of only 2 sections: Life and Awards & Honors. The only extensive section is the Awards & Honors section. There are no images included on the page. It is of interest to two WikiProjects but is currently rated stub-class. No conversations were found on the “Talk” page.

•	Reliable source:

Strauss, Evelyn. "Elizabeth Robertson." The Rockefeller University, www.rockefeller.edu/greengard-prize/recipients/robertson/. Accessed 10 Oct. 2018.

Article 2: Claudie Haigneré

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudie_Haigneré

•	This proposed modified article meets topic requirements in that it this article is about a female scientist which involves gender that is linked to oppression and involves science.

•	This proposed modified article meets scope-of-work requirements in that I could expand the article 5-fold because it is presently very underdeveloped and is rated stub-class. The summary at the top of the article is only a single sentence. Her former occupations are listed as a French doctor, politician and astronaut. She does not have a specific section for her career as a doctor. Her space career has a section but only summarizes her career in paragraph. Her political career also has a section, but it only contains 2 sentences. She has a section for her honors which comprises of one sentence. The page also includes a section regarding her suicide attempt which only states in 2 sentences that she attempted suicide and what the probable cause might’ve been. There was only one section in the “Talk” page which was about her alleged suicide attempt.

•	Reliable source:

The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "Claudie Haigneré." Encyclopedia Britannica, 2018 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 10 Feb. 2009, www.britannica.com/biography/Claudie-Haignere.

Accessed 10 Oct. 2018.

Article 3: Karen Steel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Steel

•	This proposed modified article meets topic requirements in that it this article is about a female scientist which involves gender that is linked to oppression and involves science.

•	This proposed modified article meets scope-of-work requirements in that I could expand the article 5-fold because it is currently rated stub-class and only contains 3 brief sections which are: Education, Research and Awards & Honors. Her education section is only comprised of a brief paragraph of the education she received. The education section also included some information about Steel setting up a research program at the MRC Institute of Hearing Research in Nottingham which doesn’t seem to fit in this section. The research section does not reflect her extensive involvement in research and is comprised of only 3 sentences. Is very vague and only gives a brief overview of the type of research she has done and continues to do. There were no conversations on the “Talk” page. The article is of interest to 2 WikiProjects but is rated stub-class. There have been only 35 revisions since October 2013, with the last revision being on November 9, 2016.

•	Reliable source:

"Karen Steel." Wellcome Sanger Institute, www.sanger.ac.uk/people/faculty/honorary-faculty/karen-steel. Accessed 10 Oct. 2018.

Wikipedia Exercise 6: Finalize Your Topic

Chosen/Assigned article: Article 2: Claudie Haigneré

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudie_Haigneré

This proposed modified article meets topic requirements in that it this article is about a female scientist which involves gender that is linked to oppression and involves science.

•	This proposed modified article meets scope-of-work requirements in that I could expand the article 5-fold because it is presently very underdeveloped and is rated stub-class. The summary at the top of the article is only a single sentence. Her former occupations are listed as a French doctor, politician and astronaut. She does not have a specific section for her career as a doctor. Her space career has a section but only summarizes her career in paragraph. Her political career also has a section, but it only contains 2 sentences. She has a section for her honors which comprises of one sentence. The page also includes a section regarding her suicide attempt which only states in 2 sentences that she attempted suicide and what the probable cause might’ve been. There was only one section in the “Talk” page which was about her alleged suicide attempt.

I determined "scope of work" by the 5-fold expansion and documenting areas of work and progressing using Wikipedia tool provided by Dr. Lehr. My article is still in stub-class. When I am done with your work this quarter I plan on expanding the Lead Section as well as the Article sections since they do not contain much information. I may add new sections as I see appropriate. I plan on adding references for every statement that I add and find references to support the sentences already on the page that do not have supporting references.

Additional sources:

"Claudie Haigneré (Formerly Claudie André-Deshays)." European Space Agency,

www.esa.int/Our_Activites/Human_Spaceflight/Astronauts/Claudie_Haignere_formerly_Claudie_Andre-Deshays. Accessed 19 Oct. 2018.

"Claudie Haigneré." Sanofi, www.sanofi.com/en/about-us/governance/board-of-directors/claudie-haignere. Accessed 18 Oct. 2018.

Seaburn, Paul. "'Earth Must be Warned!'-Astronaut's Caution Surfaces Again." Mysterious

              Universe, 8 Nov. 2016, mysteriousuniverse.org/2016/11/earth-must-be-warned-

astronauts-caution-surfaces-again/. Accessed 19 Oct. 2018.

Dismukes, Kim. "Expedition Three Crew Soyuz 3." National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA, 15. Oct. 2003,

spaceflight.nasa.gov/station/crew/exp3/taxi3/haignere.html. Accessed 31 Oct. 2018.

The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "Claudie Haigneré." Encyclopedia Britannica, 2018 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 10 Feb. 2009, www.britannica.com/biography/Claudie-Haignere.

MultiChoice Africa. "Claudie Haigneré, first European female astronaut to chair Jury of the DStv Eutelsat Star Awards." Eutelsat, Eutelsat Communications S.A., 19 Jan. 2017, news.eutelsat.com/pressreleases/claudie-haignere-first-female-astronaut-to-chair-jury-of-the-dstv-eutelsat-star-awards-1755261. Accessed 28 Nov. 2018.

Drafting =Claudie Haigneré= Partially blanked as WP:COPYARTICLE

Personal
[Add story about watching Neil Armstrong]

Claudie Haigneré married Jean-Pierre Haigneré, who was also a former ESA astronaut, in 2001 and together they had one daughter, Carla, in 1998. (add source about daughter here)

Background and training
Claudie Haigneré was born on May 13, 1957 in Le Creusot, France. Haigneré and studied medicine at the Faculté de Médecine (Paris-Cochin) and Faculté des Sciences (Paris-VII). She went on to obtain certificates in biology and sports medicine (1981), aviation and space medicine (1982), biomechanics and physiology of movement (1986) and received her doctorate in rheumatology (1984) and neuroscience (1992). (add additional source here).

Medical career
Haigneré medical career included working as a medical researcher as well as a doctor. Haigneré conducted research as well as applied diagnostic and therapeutic techniques in both rheumatology and sports traumatology at the Rheumatology Clinic and the Rehabilitation Department at Cochin Hospital in Paris (insert NASA source here). After reading a message on the hospital noticeboard that stated that France's space centre was looking for astronauts, Haigneré began training to become an astronaut.