User:Kara.gates/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Break (work)
The information in the article is relevant to the topic and doesn't have any distractions that stuck out to me.

The article also doesn't seem to carry any clear bias or overrepresent one side. In fact, the article doesn't have argumentativeness to it at all and seems to be informational.

The citations work, though the looks of a few of them make me question their credibility. Most of the citations are in the proper format. The facts that are stated have references at the end of the sentence that link to working webpages.

Most of the information in the article is still relevant, but the section talking about the California break laws doesn't come from beyond 2012 and could use some updating on the newer additions to the law.