User:Kareenajade/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Tylosaurus

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this because this animal is closely related to my Design Project animal and it has a lot of useful information and sources.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

The lead sentence is concise and straight to the point. However, it lacks information that distinguishes this species from all the other mosasaur species. It is nice and concise but could contain more about the information that is to follow

Content:

This article's content is extremely relevant to the topic. The content is well balanced and identifies all the major points that should be covered when defining an animal. The history of study section is super long and all of it does not seem relevant. It is valid information, but when I used this page to gather information on my animal, I skipped passed all the information after the first paragraph. It does not address topics related to underrepresented populations or topics as it doesn't really seem relevant to this topic.

Tone:

The tone of the article is completely neutral. It does not contain any bias or opinion. All content consists of facts and speculations backed by science.

Sources:

There are a lot of sources. But, not all factual statements have citations. The collection of citations is diverse and written by a variety of authors. Some of the sources do not contain the specific facts they were cited for. Not all source links are accessible articles.

Organization and Quality:

The article is well organized and broken down into easy to follow sections. No grammatical or spelling errors were detected. The writing is professional and clear.

Images:

There are many images that aid the understanding of the article. They are properly cited and correctly captioned. The images are placed in appropriate sections.

Talk Page Discussion:

There is discussion about edits and gaining clarity of the claims. It is rated a level 5 vital article in biology, Animals.

Overall Impression:

The article has very good scientific insight and is well written. There could be more sources and sources that can be accessed when clicking the link.