User:KarenM.Cook/Zones of Regulation/JayKassis Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Karen M. Cook


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:KarenM.Cook/Zones_of_Regulation&veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template&redirect=no

Evaluate the drafted changes
First Impression:

Organized, professional, and very well written.

The article is easy to understand and your facts are clear and concise.

Appropriate formatting,

Done Well:

You chose a topic that is relevant today and would make a great page since one does not yet exist for it.

Great sources, mostly peer-reviewed scholarly articles. They are also relevant and recent studies.

The titles and subtitles are appropriate.

Each section is useful and informative.

To Improve:

Saying that "The program has become increasingly popular", sounds subjective if there are no statistics to support that claim.

Saying "the curriculum is still relatively under-researched" the word relatively is vague. Also, "Some success", it is unclear how much success there is, it is a little under interpretation.

There are some sections that are vague/ general and offer little information to someone who has little understanding of the subject. For example; "The program is flexible and adaptable, and can be scaffolded to a degree that is appropriate for the developmental level".

This sounds like it may be an opinion, "In many cases, the social and emotional challenges accompanying many individuals with autism persist throughout the lifetime, rendering it important to discuss, analyze, and implement tools like social learning curricula to provide early educational support to autistic learners". Although it may be true, the wording sounds subjective.

To Consider:

-I would recommend having a contents table in the beginning of your article.

-You may consider adding images of the zones of regulations.

Overall:

Fantastic wiki page. It is organized and easy to read/ understand. At times, it may sound general or subjective, therefore I would recommend re-reading and changing some of the wording.

Great work!