User:Karenviera10/Chasing Coral/Rmorel05 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? ( User:Karenviera10/Chasing Coral)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Coral bleaching

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, the lead looks very clear and updated.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it includes an introductory portion that gives a clear idea of what the articles will be about. Very precise and focused introduction.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, it does include a brief description of the articles's major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The information covered in the lead is well explained further in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is very concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the content added is relevant to the main topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, its content is updated and includes present information.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, the content present is pertinent.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Throughout the entire article, it applies a neutral tone.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, there is not persuasion present in the article. It always keeps a neutral tone.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all the content is followed by reliable source of information.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, the sources reflex available literature on the topic.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, they current and available to the reader.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, all the links work perfectly.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the content follows a comprehensive format, very clear, and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There is no spelling errors present.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, it does include images.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes, they are well-captioned.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes, they follow Wikipedia's copyright regulations.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, very appealing to the human eye.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?