User:Kari's username/Newman Lake/Kadekeys Peer Review

General info
User:Kari's username
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Kari's username/Newman Lake
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Newman Lake, Washington

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * Overall the draft looks good - spots that need additions are marked as such, and the lead-in is a nice basic summary.
 * I would suggest turning those sub-headings into full headings to align better with the Wikipedia format. It's a pretty light suggestion, though, because it works either way.
 * The only other thing I can think to fix is expanding on a little more information because there seems to be a lot of references proportionally to the article, but even then, it's a good article as-is.