User:Karinak.kw/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Learnings Observations of Jeanne Sakata Article
 * One can use the talk page to figure out the quality of an article.
 * Wikipedia offers "Good" or "Featured" articles.
 * Reliable articles
 * "Start" or "Stub" articles are not reliable sources
 * they may not have a strong background on the topic at hand
 * this allows great opportunities for people to start editing
 * Have authority in your information by always citing materials
 * editors may remove sources that are not cited
 * One should cite whenever using any facts or for every one paragraph contributed to Wikipedia.
 * Poor sources:
 * blogs
 * social media
 * self-published materials
 * Strong sources:
 * peer-reviewed articles/journals
 * international newspapers
 * unbiased material
 * Beware of close paraphrasing
 * may lead to plagiarism
 * Be aware of copyright materials.
 * after a certain amount of time, material may become free domain, but the author of the material should still be given credit
 * long citations should be avoided -- always paraphrase
 * Everything in the article was in some way related to the topic at hand -- the media. All of the information given was connected together in one way or another, and there were no distractions.
 * The article had a neutral stance because the content presented were factual based and not opinions. As a result, there is no bias.
 * There were no conversations in the talk page.
 * The rating for this article is stated as stub-class, and it is also stated as low-importance. It is part of WikiProject Biography/Actors and Filmmakers, WikiProject United States/Asian Americans, and WikiProject Women Writers.