User:Karlabt/Lake Pflugerville/Everhartnr Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Karlabt


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Lake Pflugerville - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The organization is good. The introduction is clear and concise. I'm assuming there isn't a whole lot of information to add to certain areas, but it is written in an unbiased manner. The content improves the article and is relevant.

The sources are good and reliable. They all seem to be in the right place. I'm not sure if there is much more to be added to the article. I would like to see more flora found in that area possibly, but otherwise I think it is well written.