User:Karleeseek/Queer studies/Tge3hn Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username). Karleeseek


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Karleeseek/Queer studies


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Queer studies

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The leads of the article are okay. The background and history I think could be combined. They could both be expanded upon quite a bit. The controversies are interesting. I think a modern section would be helpful as queer studies is an ever evolving thing. I think the top section also needs revamped. The sources are very impressive. A few more images would be helpful. I think the history section is super detailed. Overall I think the page is good, I do not think the summary at the top of the page highlights the best parts of the page.