User:Karliferguson/Health issues in athletics/Szafraniect1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

KarliFerguson


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is clear and up to date with the information in the article and provides inside into what we are going to be reading about in the article. The lead is not very persuasive but has some good information about what is the article which makes it an overall solid lead.

The content added is definitely relevant and is up to date with what is going on right now. I also do not believe there are any content gaps in the new added material and that it overall explains every aspect of what they were trying to get at

I think the content added is neutral and does not take either side.