User:Karthik12s/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Chernobyl Disaster

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

The Chernobyl disaster was one of the largest disasters recorded in the last few decades. This was claimed to be the one of the main reasons for the separation of USSR. Since the incident caused huge loss to life, viewing the tone of the article is interesting. So I have selected this article for evaluation.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section of the article gives brief description of the incident occured and impact of it on the world. Each of these details were described elaborately in the next paragraphs. This lead part was quite informatic and concise. Though the incident was claimed to be disaster and caused severe loss to mankind, most of the content in the article was delivered neutrally. Also, every detail was presented with good evidence. The consequences were not stressed at any part in the article. Since the article went into many modifications, the content was delivered with good language and zero grammatical errors. The article was drafted using 278 different sources. These sources include the reports from scientific labs, research journals.

On the whole, the article managed to provide information of every detailed aspect that is connected with the disaster right from the things led to disaster to the consequences.