User:Kassidystevens/Eva Nassif/ZioinQueenT Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Kassidystevens
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Kassidystevens/Eva Nassif

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes it has
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? The lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and Cleary describes the article's topics.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The lead does include a brief description of the articles major sections ?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no it does not
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? the lead is concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? content is very relevant to topic
 * Is the content added up-to-date? the content is up to date
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no there is not

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? the content is neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? there are not heavily biased claims
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? there are no view points that are over represented or underrepresented
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? The content does not try to persuade a leader

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?   The new content is backed up by reliable secondary source of infromation
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources are thorough
 * Are the sources current? The sources are Current
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The links work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?  The content is well written
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There are no grammatical or spelling errors
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
No images were added to this article, hence no review can be given for this part of the peer review.

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
- Not a new article

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes it has improved the quality
 * What are the strengths of the content added? good information on positions held in through out here career
 * How can the content added be improved? The user did her best to find information on her politician, despite it being a bit of a challenge. Good Job on the information found so far. Maybe check her twitter page to. see if you can get more information on her.