User:Kat975/Women in the Czech Republic/Hbnh1 Peer Review

I. Which article are you evaluating?

Women in the Czech Republic

Kat975

II. Evaluate the article

Evaluate the article using the following rubric. Note, you do not need to leave comments for each question. Use the comments boxes to elaborate on notable successes or highlight key shortcomings of the article.

Lead section

A good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.

Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Does the lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

NO

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Does the lead include information that is not present in the article? (It shouldn't.)

NO

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Is the lead concise (as opposed to overly detailed)?

NO

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Content

A good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Is the content up-to-date?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

-only includes current statistic and does not go into depth on how women are perceived in the Czech society

Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? That is, does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Tone and Balance

Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.

Is the article neutral?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

NO

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

NO

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Are minority or fringe viewpoints accurately described as such?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

NO

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Sources and References

A Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Are the sources current?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

more diverse sources can be used

Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)

NO

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

current ones are fine as they are

Check a few links. Do they work?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Organization and writing quality

The writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

majority of the article felt like a listing of facts and stats though

Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?

NO

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Images and Media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

more images could be used

Are images well-captioned?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

YES

as of 12/08/21 6:15PM there is no information in the sandbox draft

III. Overall impressions

Because the sandbox currently does not have any edits to the original article, the following peer review will be about the original article “Women in the Czech Republic.” The article has a good base with the organized sections for the various fields of information. Each section is written in a pretty unbiased manner, albeit that the majority of the sections consists mainly of statistics. Although the statistics are informative and useful, they could be better integrated into the article, as they currently read like a list of facts (especially in the reproductive rights and family life section). The article could use some more sections that expand on more aspects of Czech women such as the history of their role in society. The article could also use a section that acknowledges the difference between the typical Czech woman and any minority women living in the Czech Republic, as this can affect the majority of the statistics currently provided. The current sections can also be expanded further beyond just statistics. The article does not look messy but could use additional pictures to enhance the information as more sections are added.