User:Kate.healy/Alaina Lockhart/Abrazzale Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Kate.healy
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Kate.healy/Alaina Lockhart

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes
 * Includes information on past election win and her lose in the 2019 elections
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * All information in the lead is supported by findings within the article
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Brief and to the point but includes a look into the main points of the article

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Includes the information about the past election results
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Maybe look into information on the private bill sponsored by Lockhart (Bill M-39), on Immigration to Atlantic Canada
 * https://www.ourcommons.ca/Members/en/Alaina-Lockhart(88357)/Motions/8111327 check out this website to see the process it went through and the final votes

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, just gives the information

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Many facts also include 2 sources which is excellent
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Articles are from the 2015 election to the current one (2015-2019)
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The few that have been check work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Fixed some minor sentence structures
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * information is organized well and broken down into sub headings

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes
 * Includes photos of electoral district and Fundy National Park upgrades
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes, both images found using wiki images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes
 * Images are next to the information related to them

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes
 * The article has improved from the original with added information on 2019 election results and pollical career
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Information on her improvements as the secretary to small business and tourism
 * past business experience before entering parliament
 * Updated information on the 2019 elections
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Minor edits from above guiding questions (Bill M-39)
 * Amazing Work!