User:Katearb0n/Wet nurse/Amandaaaaam Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead


 * Yes, the lead has been updated to reflect the new content added
 * Yes, the lead has an introductory sentence that describes the article's topic

Content


 * Yes, the content added is relevant to the topic
 * There is no content that is missing

Tone and Balance


 * Yes, the content added is neutral
 * Maybe reword the sentence that says "Black enslaved wet nurses were crucial..."

Sources and References


 * Yes, the content added is backed up by a reliable source


 * Yes, the content accurately reflects what the cited sources say

Organization


 * Yes, the content added is well-written
 * In regards to grammar and spelling, perhaps change "desired" to "desire" and "to the" to "with the"
 * Yes, the content added is well-organized

Overall impressions


 * Content that can be improved includes what I previously addressed; maybe reword the sentence that says "Black enslaved wet nurses were crucial..."


 * The strengths of the content added include the fact that it's accessible and concise