User:Kateconnolly02/Washington Square, Syracuse/Joelauria316 Peer Review

General info
Kate and Allie
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Kateconnolly02/Washington Square, Syracuse
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Don't think any exists currently

Evaluate the drafted changes
Great work guys! I enjoyed learning more about Washington Square in your article. Here's my review. Before I get into any of the content of the article, I think one major thing to do would be to remove the working bibliography from the article draft. It was a little confusing at first when I opened your draft and almost thought you hadn't completed it yet. This is a super simple fix! Just add the citations to the references slot you guys made and remove the bullet points reasoning why you plan on using each source in your paper.

Secondly, I think adding more larger sections within your article will make it a lot more presentable for the final draft. Right now, it's just one large clunk of sub-headings, but I think all of them could be their own section. This will allow you to get more specific with your article and each section overall.

In regards to the content, I think there is for sure more stuff that can be added about Washington Square. I think this is certainly the case when it comes to the history section for example. It's kind of a big jump from the 1700s to discussing the current day dimensions in the history section, and I believe there is for sure more that can be added. I also think in the education system discussing reviews of the school might not be the best worded part of your article. Maybe add some direct quotes from where you found the reviews to use in this part of your paper.