User:Kateim/Danielna418/sandbox/Kateim Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Danielna418
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danielna418/sandbox&oldid=949335240

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * There is no lead.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * There is no lead.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * There is no lead.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * There is no lead.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * There is no lead.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * I cannot say because the sandbox article has no title.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * I cannot say because I do not know what the article pertains to.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I cannot say because the sandbox article has no title.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I cannot say because I'm not sure what the article is about.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * N/A.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * There are no citations and references.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * There are no citations and references.
 * Are the sources current?
 * There are no citations and references.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * There are no citations and references.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * It is well-written.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * I cannot say because there is only one section called, "Government Post" which talks about Thomas Sankara.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * There are no images.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * There are no images.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * There are no images.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * There are no references or citations on the page.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * The person listed no citations.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * This article lacks a title.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * No.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * I cannot say.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The information is neutral.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Overall, I recommend that you add the article title because without an article title I'm not sure what the paragraph about Sankara pertains to or if it is relevant. You also need to add citations as there are no citations/references right now, so I'm not sure if the information you put is accurate. Overall, 4 sentences is not enough information for me to peer edit.