User:Katelyncothren/Pinus echinata/Oakpinemaple Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Im reviewing katelyncothren's wiki draft.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Peer Review wiki.docx (sharepoint.com)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

'''1.    First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?'''

The article does a good job of supplying neutral unbiased facts. I found the article to be straight forward with its information. I liked the way they separated some of the smaller paragraphs within the headers and added simple terms in parentheses next to words that can be unknown to the common reader.

'''2.    What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?'''

There were a few grammatical errors but overall, the article was great. I will say that there is a lot of sentences that need a reference at the end rather than the end of the paragraph because if the paragraph itself isn't in quotations than the sentences without a citation is technically being claimed as your own words.

3.    What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

Citations and minor grammatical fixes.

'''4.    Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!'''

I liked the way you spaced your paragraphs out under each heading, separating different information that is relevant to that section. I did not do that, but I will consider reformatting mine that way as it is easier to follow along and read.

5.     Copy and paste the article including references into Word and determine the number of words in the article, do they meet the criteria (at least 1200 words).

Article reaches the criteria. OakPineMaple (talk) 11:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)