User:Katewun/Gender dysphoria/Bsgasca Peer Review

General info
Katewun
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Creating User:Katewun/Gender dysphoria - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gender dysphoria - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * 1) Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new context added by your peer?
 * 2) Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * 3) Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * 4) Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * 5) Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Context


 * 1) Is the context added relevant to the topic?
 * 2) Is the content added up-to-date?
 * 3) Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * 4) Does the article address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone/ Balance


 * 1) Is the content added neutral?
 * 2) Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * 3) Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * 4) Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Source/ References


 * 1) is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * 2) Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say?
 * 3) Are the sources thorough?
 * 4) Are the sources current?
 * 5) Are there better sources?
 * 6) Do the links work?

Organization


 * 1) Is the content well written: concise, clear and easy to read?
 * 2) Does the content added have grammatical or spelling errors?

Overall Impressions


 * 1) Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article?
 * 2) What are the strengths of the content added?
 * 3) How can the content added be improved?