User:KatherineWhitehead/sandbox

Article Evaluation

For my article evaluation I used the Wikipedia page about the field of journalism. Everything in the article seems to be relevant. It is mainly about the history of journalism to today. Nothing appears to be biased. The updates are pretty relevant. The last update was in August 2017. I didn't like that when it talks about the production of journalism, it immediately jumps to things about bloggers and fake news. That did seem to be maybe a bit biased, but I presume the writer felt it relevant. I'm just not sure about the placement. I feel like they could have talked more about the code of ethics and the history of journalism. They need to expand upon journalism's past and how it came to be what it is now. The links also seem to be working correctly. In the talk section people seem to be pretty salty. Some people are kind of accusing others of bias by using the phrase "so-called journalist".