User:Katherineamerica/Brasil Sem Homophobia/Ambermrush Peer Review

Peer reviews
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Katherineamerica
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Brasil Sem Homophobia

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? no
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? a little too concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes!
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes but maybe add something about the current view regarding the program? Do people want it reinstated?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Just expand on it where you can. Who were the most prominent figures?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No. Nice job!
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No but maybe organize it so there's a clear pros and cons section
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Nope

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current? I believe so
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes. What would Brazil do without you?
 * What are the strengths of the content added? you really added a lot and I think we would be lost without your contribution.
 * How can the content added be improved? Perhaps expand on the trans community. How did this impact the AIDs crisis? Was there popular discontent in the country? I know this article is difficult to edit because I doubt theres much info on it. But its important to add the trans community! I found that on my article (LGBT in Cuba) totally excluded the trans community.