User:Katherynriescher/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Article: Open Access
 * 1) I found the information to all be relevant and neatly organized in sections, nothing distracted me.
 * 2) It does not seem to be biased towards one way or the other. The article does not give any opinions about which types of open access are best.
 * 3) The article has most of it's information about the "open access movement," who are fighting against restricting access to information. However, there is a section about publishers that are against that idea.
 * 4) Yes, the links work and the information is available in the source.
 * 5) There are a couple sentences with citations needed. The sources available all seem to be unbiased, but there is no notes of bias before any citations.
 * 6) They are discussing how to include information about some recent controversies around the issue. Somebody changed the work piracy to infringement, as piracy has a negative connotation.
 * 7) The article is rated as "start" which means it is developing, but in my opinion that needs to be changed. It is not part of any projects.
 * 8) I don't think the article differs from how we talked about it in class.