User:Kathleenvoight/sandbox

Chalchiuhtlicue article review

 * information is disorganized
 * information is repeated in various paragraphs
 * few sources cited
 * irrelevant information around the work of one specific scholar
 * grammatical and spelling errors
 * information that is untrue/inaccurate
 * sentence are poorly written

Coyolxāuhqui article review

 * The pages focuses primarily on the figure of Coyolxāuhqui, with supporting information on the monument.
 * There is a page dedicated explicitly to the monument (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coyolxauhqui_Stone) but it is a stub.
 * The articles uses the image of the Coyolxāuhqui stone in the intro section to illustrate the story of Coyolxāuhqui.
 * It is unclear why the stone represents a dismembered Coyolxāuhqui, when the introduction seems to imply that it was her mother who was dismembered (this is clarified later in the article).
 * The article is clearly written and informative.
 * The article also features an image of the Coyolxāuhqui stone with its imagined original coloring.