User:KathrynMA/Milicent Shinn/Margaux Blanchard Peer Review

Well done! I feel that the information added to this page on Milicent Shinn was appropriate and concise. A good amount of detail was utilized, and I appreciated the use of quotations. The content was unbiased and reflected a neutral tone, with equal representation of viewpoints. There was no use of persuasion, just presentation of actual information from reliable sources. Overall, the edit was clear and added relevant information to this topic.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)