User:KatieLeim305/sandbox

Evaluation of The Spanish Tragedy
For the wikipedia review assignment this week, I reviewed The Spanish Tragedy page. Under the talk section, Wikipedians have rated it as a c-class in quality. Overall, the article had a decent amount of information. There were fourteen main sections, with two subsections under "Performance". However, there were a few areas that could use improvement. In multiple points, there are notes that say citations are needed, for example, under the "Modern performances" subcategory, "Authorship" section, and "1602 additions". There are also multiple points where Wikipedians have added the comment "clarification needed" when sentences are a bit confusing. Similarly, the page contains a few instances of "weasel words", such as under the "1602 additions" page. This means that instead of clearly stating a fact, the author vaguely alluded to a general conception or idea that does not have an exact origin or source. Another issue that I found with The Spanish Tragedy play was that links such as "Balthazar", "Abel Jeffes" and "Solimon and Perseda" lead to nonexistent pages. This is confusing for the reader and if a page does not exist, it should not be linked. Finally, under the plot area, the role of the messenger and the box subplot is left out, which I believe is important enough to be mentioned. Similarly, the author stated that in the end of the play, Andrea is satisfied with the events of the play. I think this is opinion more than fact, as it is left ambiguous if Andrea is satisfied that everyone he loved tragically dies. Overall, I think the article covers many topics surrounding the play, however the smaller details need more improvement to create a more seamless and comprehensive source on The Spanish Tragedy.

A Game at Chess Implementation Draft
My work is in LukeMahaney's sandbox. I wrote the second paragraph that summarized criticisms and interpretations. We edited each other's work and added/ made changes.