User:Katiegarce/Rubus armeniacus/Indiginkgo Peer Review

General info
Katiegarce
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Katiegarce/Rubus armeniacus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Rubus armeniacus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: No changes being made

Content and Tone: The content added is relevant to the topic, adding important new information. It safely approaches this with unbiased yet informing language.

Sources and References: The information added and revised is relevant and backed up with up to date, working linked references. The references themselves work and are a wide variety of sources.

Organization: For what is being added to the information already present, the article will have a great organization, being clearly written and concise. There are potentially a few grammatical errors, but sentence structure flows well and is easy to read.

Images and media: No changes being made

Overall Impressions: The information to be added is valuable and well informed. It will make this article a well-rounded one.