User:Katien13/Moneybagg Yo/The.Jeremiah02 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Katien13


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Katien13/newsandbox.


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
First, I noticed that you had more edits on Main Street Collierville than Moneybagg Yo so I review your Main Street article. The lead section could be cut down as the first two, three sentences summarize what you are going to discuss in the article and you can move the last two sentences into another part of the article. The transition into the new section, however, is good. The content presented is very well rounded and definitely have a great overview of what Main Street has to offer. The tone is fairly neutral, There are some parts where you can see your personal connection to Main Street but overall it is pretty neutral. The sources are reliable and accurate but I noticed that half of the sentences aren't cited. I didn't know if that was because you had back-to-back sentences use the same graph or if they don't have any sources. The organization is nice and a few pictures would be a good addition. Overall, the article is good and with a few more tweaks it will look even better.