User:Katrinabauman20/Ark of Bukhara/Jroadif1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Katrinabauman20


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Katrinabauman20/Ark of Bukhara - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ark of Bukhara - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead is a good summary of the article. It's concise and doesn't include extra information not in the article. However, it doesn't seem like there is mention of the construction process, origin, or its ties to astrology.

Content: The topics added are relevant and I found them very interesting. I think the ties to the constellations is very cool; it reminds me of Mayan architecture.

Tone and Balance: Good tone, not biased

Sources and References: All new information is cited, and sources are reliable.

Organization: I think "Construction" and "Legendary origin" could be combined. It seemed a little repetitive. The ties to astrology could also fall into Legendary Origin, and both sections fall into "History". Maybe a solution is different headings. Some sentences feel a bit choppy to read, and there are a few grammar/spelling errors.