User:Katrinabauman20/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Chand Baori
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead paragraph is incredibly short with very limited information. This article is very small and has very little details on every aspect of the building. There is a lot of room for growth on this article. The information is supported by accurate sources though. For the most part the article is well written and would not require much correction if any.
 * Sources
 * https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/masterstheses/719/
 * https://www.proquest.com/docview/1893096678?pq-origsite=summon&parentSessionId=%2FXzy8KdSEpHhtLFN1dsQmqT5abF8h4rpZnPszSVUN%2FY%3D
 * https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/masterstheses/719/
 * https://www.proquest.com/docview/1893096678?pq-origsite=summon&parentSessionId=%2FXzy8KdSEpHhtLFN1dsQmqT5abF8h4rpZnPszSVUN%2FY%3D

Option 2

 * Ark of Bukhara
 * Article Evaluation
 * The first paragraph is well written but may need some adjustments if more information is added to the article. It is a well written article and has a decent amount of information on the building. Most of this information is not pertaining to the actual structure though and just focuses on the history of the site. Not all of the sources for the site seem necessarily reliable and some information may need to be corrected in the article.
 * Sources
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160932722000011?via%3Dihub
 * https://cajssh.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJSSH/article/view/93/78
 * https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nafisa-Jurayeva/publication/349686177_Features_of_the_Historical_Topography_of_the_City_of_Bukhara/links/603cb58da6fdcc37a85db741/Features-of-the-Historical-Topography-of-the-City-of-Bukhara.pdf
 * https://cajssh.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJSSH/article/view/93/78
 * https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nafisa-Jurayeva/publication/349686177_Features_of_the_Historical_Topography_of_the_City_of_Bukhara/links/603cb58da6fdcc37a85db741/Features-of-the-Historical-Topography-of-the-City-of-Bukhara.pdf

Option 3

 * Chogha Zanbil
 * Article Evaluation
 * The introductory paragraph is rather slim and could use some more details. All of the information in the article primarily focuses on the the history of the site. There is a decent amount of information discussing the construction of the ruins as well but very little actual describing the building. There are a lot of sources used to support the information but overall they appear to be reliable. All in all this article is well written and could just use some more information on the structure to be complete.
 * Sources
 * https://www.oxfordartonline.com/groveart/view/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.001.0001/oao-9781884446054-e-7000017332#oao-9781884446054-e-7000017332
 * https://www.scientific.net/AMR.457-458.395
 * https://www.oxfordartonline.com/groveart/view/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.001.0001/oao-9781884446054-e-7000017332#oao-9781884446054-e-7000017332
 * https://www.scientific.net/AMR.457-458.395

Option 4

 * Rye Castle
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article is very short and only discusses the history of the architecture. Its first paragraph is very short and could easily be lengthened to improve the article. There are a lot of sources but there is not much information gotten from these sources. Overall this article could use a lot more information added to it to create a complete report.
 * Sources
 * https://www.proquest.com/docview/1542852776?pq-origsite=summon&imgSeq=1
 * Sources
 * https://www.proquest.com/docview/1542852776?pq-origsite=summon&imgSeq=1

Option 5

 * Corgaff Castle
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article only discusses the life of the people in the castle but nothing on the actual construction or structure. Its lead paragraph has very few sentences or details. This article could use a lot more details discussing the architecture. The sources used seem reliable so there should not need to be any corrections on what is already written. Although there is very little in this article, it is well done.
 * Sources
 * http://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/view/7691/7659
 * Sources
 * http://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/psas/article/view/7691/7659