User:Kats50/Awaous stamineus/Akaub Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.) I think that I did my research pretty well and that I have great resources.
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Since I am doing my own review on my article, I think that the information and where I got my resources was good
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way? All the information that I have learned about my species was very interesting to learn and I tried to put a lot about what they look like and how they live
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes, however I forgot to put them in a number format instead of citing the whole thing
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? Yes
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes, but I didn't link it in a number format
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? I think that the sources that I have choose are good ones.
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? I think that I need to add more details, make categories, and fix my souses and make them into a number format.
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? These changes would be an improvement because with the categories it would be easier to read what is what and adding more details from a reliable source is always good. I also need to change the citations so that they are in a number format to be easier than having the whole thing sited.
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? Almost ready but I have to fix some things in my assignment first like the numbering format and categories
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Making it easier to understand with the categories and number format for the citations.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? A review is missing and I am reviewing my own instead but I have seen other articles and I have taken notice of how they formatted it and how I can do changes on mine as well to improve my article