User:Kats50/Awaous stamineus/Jessicacezar Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Kats50


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kats50/Awaous_stamineus?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Awaous stamineus
 * Awaous stamineus

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? I think that the author did a good job of citing their references and sources as well as describing and giving facts about their species.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way? The author did a good job of describing the appearance of their species and reproduction/ mating process.
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes, however instead of using numbers the author just cited the whole source. Thank you for letting me know about that. I wasn't actually sure how to change it into number form.
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? Yes
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? No number, but there is still many different sources that is correctly cited
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? I think that these sources seem to be very reliable and informative
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? I would probably suggest formatting the article where certain topics about the species is separated so it is a little easier to read I forgot to do that while uploading this assignment. Thank you for reminding me.
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? I think the article is well written, I would maybe just suggest attaching the little number to the sources so that you don't have to cite the full source in the article
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Maybe separate the topics and if possible add more information and details about the species Thank you for your review, it was actually kinda hard to find articles and stuff about this fish however, I could add more from the articles that I already cited because there were a lot of good information on there.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? They did a great job of correctly citing their sources which is something I need to do in my own article Thank you Jessicacezar for peer reviewing my article, I really appreciate it! I will make those changes right away by figuring out how to make the numbers for the sources, adding more information, and separating my information into their own categories. I hope you are doing a good in this wiki assignment as well as this class. Keep it up! :)