User:Katycakes11/Robert E Lee blvd/Kambeau Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Katycakes11


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Katycakes11/Robert E Lee blvd


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is informative, but can use some grammatical work and be more concise. The lead mentions the committee for the renaming of New Orleans streets, which would be a good section that the article has, but the article doesn't. The description can be more specific and clear.

The article's content includes research about the actual figure behind the street, or rather boulevard, which is relevant to the topic. Once again, things such as the actual geography and location of the topic is underrepresented and should have a section added about it. The content in the entertainment section can be merged into the lead, as it is very updated and people reading this article should read upon those things first.

The article should be neutral, but is a little more on the negative tone. The article is somewhat persuading readers in a negative way about the topic, and that tone can easily change with the edits suggested.

The article has many sources that seem relevant and up to date. Every section has citations, though the section about Robert E. Lee should have more citations than the other two sections. There is one source that it clickable, but nothing about the topic comes up so that source needs to be deleted or updated. There is a little unbalance in the content of the sources, but once again, more references and sources for the history can change that.

The article has a lead and two sections, and needs to have more sections added. There is a grammatical errors that somewhat takeaway from the overall article, which may be a problem.

There aren't any media or images in the article.

The article has sources about Robert E. Lee, but more needs to be added, as mentioned earlier. The sources all seem diverse in their research, so more sources need to be added so that there is a balance.

Overall, the article is up to a good start, as it is only a draft, and with the suggested edits it can grow into a really strong article.