User:Katycakes11/Robert E Lee blvd/Zospence3 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Katycakes11)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Katycakes11/Robert E Lee blvd

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead paragraph is very strong and concise. It adds a good overview of what the content will entail and provides the right amount of details to introduce the topic. The lead section does appear to be heavily about the geography of the street. The introduction should be changed to include current bars and restaurants since that topic has a heading later on in the content. However, it does do good job of briefly describing the rest of the sections that are talked about. The lead does mention renaming, which is not mentioned later but probably should have its own section about the renaming of the street.

The content added is very relevant to the topic. And appears to be up to date seeing that it mentions modern dining places and attractions on the street. There should probably be a content section dedicated to the geographical location of the street and the renaming of the street due to the current racial climate etc. The article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps by addressing the unfair treatment of African Americans slaves by the person who this street is named after.

For the most part, the content is neutral, but can seem a bit biased at times when talking about Robert E Lee, possibly due to the tone in the source used. The issue of racism is a tricky/touchy subject, it can at times seem to be more persuasive into a certain narrative of Robert E Lee; because of this every sentence in this section should be specifically sourced.

This article does a good job of adding a wide array of sources for the content that has been added, whether it be about a historical figure of geographical location of the street. All of the sources are current and working. They also include a variety of authors and publishers. However, the 4th link "Search" on New Orleans.com did not work and should be updated to the specific web page that was used, because as of now it just takes you to a blank page with a search bar. I also could not get the 3rd source listed to load Brittanica.com.

The article is well written and easy to read. There are a few small grammatical errors such as "slaved" instead of slaves. The article is broken down well into relevant sections.

There are no images. Images of Robert E. Lee could be added since is is a central topic of this article. Also add images of the street in todays time as well as back when it was first named/made if possible.

Overall the article is good and very detailed and thoroughly cited.