User:Kautilya3/sandbox/Godhra train burning

The Godhra train burning was an incident that occurred on the morning of 27 February 2002, in which 59 people, including 25 women and 15 children, died in a fire inside the Sabarmati Express train near the Godhra railway station in the Indian state of Gujarat. The victims were mainly Hindu pilgrims and activists who were returning from the city of Ayodhya after a religious ceremony at the disputed Babri Masjid site. The commission set up by the government of Gujarat to investigate the train burning spent 6 years going over the details of the case, and concluded that the fire was arson committed by a mob of 1000-2000 people. A commission appointed by the central government, whose appointment was later held to be unconstitutional, stated that the fire had been an accident. A court convicted 31 Muslims for the incident and the conspiracy for the crime, although the actual causes of the fire have yet to be proven conclusively.

The event is widely perceived as the trigger for the violence that followed, which resulted in widespread loss of life, destruction of property and homelessness. Estimates of casualties range from the official figures of 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus, to upwards of 2000 casualties. Some hold the view that the attack on the train was a "staged trigger" for premeditated rioting.

Background
The Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) had set the deadline of 15 March 2002 for building a Ram Janmabhoomi temple at site of the demolished Babri Masjid in Ayodhya. To drum up support for the programme, the VHP conceived a campaign whereby residents at various localities around the country chant Ram's name for 65 days non-stop and then qualify to attend a Purnahuti Maha Yagna ceremony in Ayodhya. Some 2,000 volunteers from Gujarat enrolled for this campaign.

These "activists and supporters of VHP" left for Ayodhya in three batches on the 22, 24 and 26 Febuary, wearing saffron headbands and carrying trishuls and `Ram Sevak' cards provided by the VHP and its affiliated organisations (Bajrang Dal and Durga Vahini). The government took care to arrange police presence at all the railway stations in Gujarat en route to Ayodhya, and the platforms were cleared of Muslim vendors in order to avoid tensions.

However, no such arrangements were made for the return journey of the Ram sevaks. Passengers said that stone-throwing on the Sabarmati Express of 26 February began at the Rudauli station near Lucknow, and there was trouble at several stations en route to Ahmedabad, causing a 4 hour-delay in the running of the train. However this information did not reach the Godhra station before the train itself did.

The Sabarmati Express reached the Godhra station at 7:43am on the 27 February. The platform was full of waiting commuters, many Muslim. According to eye witnesses, the VHP passengers that alighted the train for tea and breakfast were carrying sticks. They man-handled at least one tea vendor, pulled the beard of another, flung tea on the face of yet another vendor, and forced many Muslims to chant `Jai Shri Ram.' Several bearded Muslims on the platform were chased with sticks and some beaten. Three policemen standing on the platform did not intervene.

A vendor has stated that they tried to molest a young Muslim woman by name Sophiya Shaikh. Shaikh was returning home after visiting her aunt that lived in the Signal Falia area and waiting for her train sitting on a bench on the platform, along with mother and sister. The three of them tried to go out of the station after the commotion started, when a man grabbed her from behind and pulled her towards the train. Shaikh let out a cry and the man released her. The three women ran away into a waiting room. Journalist Jyoti Punwani said that she met many eyewitnesses at the Godhra station that confirmed the incident. Statements of the three women were recorded by the police on 28 March. Shaikh has stated that the passengers also tried to abduct another burqa-clad woman on the platform.

The attack on the train
Anees Piplodwala, a regular commuter on the Dehradun Express, has mentioned a burqa-clad woman exhorting the waiting commuters to respond. Some people started throwing stones at the train. The passengers inside the train closed the windows and some climbed onto the upper berths for safety. Railway Protection Force constables are said to have arrived on the platform and began to implore the VHP passengers `with folded hands' to get back on the train.

The train started pulling away from the platform after a 3-minute halt, and several VHP passengers were still left behind at the station. Passengers inside several coaches pulled the chain, activating the emergency brake, to enable their fellow passengers to get back on the train. Consequently, the train stopped even before clearing the platform. The stone pelting from the platform is said to have continued while the emergency brakes were reset and the train could resume at around 8 a.m.

The train stopped for a second time a few minutes later, about 1 km away from the station. The chain was pulled again according to the engine driver. It stopped near the signal cabin `A', with the neighbourhood of `Signal Falia' lying on the left side of tracks, which has mostly Muslim residents. The staff in the cabin saw a large mob consisting of Muslims surround the entire train and pelt stones at it. One of them heard the mob shouting that one of their people was inside. The stone throwing reportedly continued even after the coach S-6 caught fire.

Assistant station master Rajendraprasad Meena, who was at the `A' cabin, stated that there was no mob waiting for the train near the cabin. The people came from behind the train, in groups of 10-15 persons, and then gathered at the spot. They came via the narrow road running parallel to the track adjacent to the Signal Falia neighbourhood. He estimated a crowd of 250-500 people.

Reactions and police investigation
Although the district collector Jayanti Ravi has mentioned that `anti-social elements' were responsible, the Gujarat and the central governments insisted that it was pre-meditated, well-planned act of terrorism. Chief Minister Narendra Modi called it the "jihadi mentality." Central Home Minister L. K. Advani said the "needle of suspicion" pointed towards the Pakistan's ISI. According to Siddharth Varadarajan, the BJP was tapping into its own propaganda about the Muslims of India being disloyal citizens and willing agents of Pakistan.

27 February 2002 incident
In February 2002, thousands of devotees of Rama (known as "Ramsevaks" or "Kar Sevaks") had gone from Gujarat to Ayodhya at the behest of the Vishva Hindu Parishad to take part in a ceremony called the Purnahuti Maha Yagna. On 25 February, 2,000–2,200 Ramsevaks boarded the Sabarmati Express which was bound for Ahmedabad. On 27 February 2002, the train made its scheduled stop at Godhra about four hours late, at 7:43 am. As the train started leaving the platform, someone pulled the emergency brake and the train stopped near the signal point. The driver of the train subsequently stated that the chain had been pulled multiple times, judging by the instruments in his cabin.

The train was subsequently attacked by a mob of around 2,000 people. After some stone-pelting, four coaches of the train were set alight, trapping many people inside. 59 people including 27 women and 10 children were burnt to death, and 48 others were injured. According to J Mahapatra, additional director general of the Gujarat police, "miscreants had kept the petrol-soaked rags ready for use much before the train had arrived at the Godhra". Martha Nussbaum has challenged this narrative, stating that multiple inquiries have found that the conflagration was an accident rather than a planned conspiracy. Madhu Kishwar has blamed the "amazing distortions introduced by Congress and its leftist allies" as the reason why the facts are not widely known and accepted.

Forensic Science Laboratory Report
A study conducted by the Gujarat Forensic Science Laboratory report states that 60 liters of inflammable liquid had been poured into coach S-6 of the train using a wide mouthed container. It had been poured by standing on the passage between the northern side-door of the eastern side of the coach, which had been set on fire immediately thereafter. The report also concluded that there had been heavy stone pelting on the train.

Appointment
On 6 March 2002, the Gujarat government set up a commission of inquiry to investigate the incident and submit a report, the chairman and sole member of which was retired Gujarat High Court judge K G Shah. However, Shah's alleged closeness to Narendra Modi generated fierce criticism from the victims, Human Rights organisations, and political parties, and led to a demand for the appointment of a Supreme Court judge to the commission. As a result, the government reconstituted the commission into a two member committee, appointing retired Supreme Court judge G T Nanavati to lead the commission, which thus became known as the "Nanavati-Shah Commission." Shah passed away in March 2008, just a few months prior to the committee submitting its first report, and the Gujarat High Court then appointed retired judge Akshay Kumar Mehta to the committee on 6 April 2008. The commission, during its six-year probe, examined more than 40,000 documents and the testimonies of more than 1,000 witnesses. The initial term of the committee was three months long; however, it has received 24 extensions, till November 2014, to submit its final report.

Report
In September 2008, the commission submitted the "Part I" of the report dealing with the Godhra incident, in which it supported the conspiracy theory originally propounded by the Gujarat police. Maulvi Husain Haji Ibrahim Umarji, a cleric in Godhra, and a dismissed Central Reserve Police Force officer named Nanumiyan were presented as the "masterminds" behind the operation. The evidence marshalled by the committee in favour of this conclusion was a statement made by Jabir Binyamin Behra, a criminal in custody at the time, although he later denied giving any such statement. In addition, the alleged acquisition of 140 litres of petrol hours before the arrival of the train and the storage of said petrol at the guest house of Razzak Kurkur, accused of being a key conspirator, as well as forensic evidence showing that fuel was poured on the train coach before it burnt, was presented by the committee. The report concluded that the train was attacked by thousands of Muslims from the Signal Falia area.

Reactions
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Indian National Congress both objected to the exoneration of the Gujarat government by the commission citing the timing of the report (with general elections months away) as evidence of unfairness. Congress spokesperson Veerappa Moily commented at the strange absolvement of the Gujarat government for complacency for the carnage before the commission's second and final report had been brought out. The CPI(M) said that the report reinforced communal prejudices. The commission has been heavily criticised by academics such as Christophe Jaffrelot for obstructing the course of justice, supporting the conspiracy theory too quickly, and for allegedly ignoring evidence of governmental complicity in the incident.

Appointment and Report
On 17 May 2004, with the victory of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) in the Indian general election, Lalu Prasad Yadav was appointed railway minister. In September 2004, two and half years after the train burning, Yadav appointed former Supreme Court Justice Umesh Chandra Banerjee to investigate the incident. In January 2005 Banerjee presented his interim report, which tentatively ascribed the fire as an "accidental fire," after ruling out other theories. He cited a forensic report stating that the injuries on the victims were only compatible with an "internal fire." The report was also critical of the railways' handling of the evidence relevant to the case.

High Court judgment
Banerjee's findings were challenged in the Gujarat High Court by Neelkanth Tulsidas Bhatia, who was injured in the incident. In October 2006, the court quashed the conclusions of Banerjee and ruled that the investigation was "unconstitutional, illegal and null and void", declared its formation to be a "colourable exercise of power with mala fide intentions", and its argument of accidental fire "opposed to the prima facie accepted facts on record." The High Court also directed that the report should not be tabled in the Parliament.

Reactions
The BJP, which was then in opposition in the union parliament, dismissed the report as an attempt to gain an advantage in the Bihar elections which were to be held soon. It welcomed the High Court judgement, saying that it was a setback for the Congress. Lalu Prasad Yadav, then the minister for railways, cited the report as proof that the Narendra Modi government had organized the riots that followed, and called it an exposure of the BJP.

Arrests
By 28 February 2002, 51 people had been arrested for the incident on charges of arson, rioting and looting. One of the alleged organisers of the attack was arrested in West Bengal. West Bengal's Chief Secretary, Sourin Roy, said the detainee was a commander of the Muslim radical group Harkat-ul Jehad-e-Islami, who was allegedly attempting to enter Bangladesh. On 17 March 2002, chief suspect Haji Bilal, a local town councillor and an Indian National Congress supporter, was captured by an anti-terrorist squad in Godhra. The FIR had alleged that a 1540-strong mob attacked the Sabarmati Express on 27 February, minutes after the delayed train left the Godhra station on the day of the incident. The president of Godhra municipality, Mohammed Hussain Kalota, was arrested in March. Others arrested included corporators Abdul Razak and Shiraj Abdul Jamesha. Bilal was also alleged to have a connection with gang leader Latif and was reported to have visited Karachi in Pakistan several times.

The charge-sheet filed by the SIT before first class railway magistrate P. K. Joshi, which ran to more than 500 pages, stated that 59 people were killed in the S-6 coach of Sabarmati Express when a mob of around 1540 unidentified people attacked it near Godhra railway station. The 68 people accused in the charge-sheet included 57 accused of stoning and torching the train. The charge-sheet also stated that a mob attacked the police, prevented the fire brigade from approaching the burning train, and stormed the train for a second time. 11 others were charged with being part of this mob. Initially, 107 people were charged, five of whom died while the case was still pending in court. Eight others were juveniles, who were tried by a separate court. As many as 253 witnesses were examined during the trial and over items of 1500 documentary evidences were presented to the court.

Prevention of Terrorism Act and trial
On 3 March 2002, The Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance was invoked against all the accused which was later suspended due to pressure from the Central government. On 9 March 2002, Police added Criminal Conspiracy to the charges. In May 2003, the first charge sheet was filed against 54 accused, but they were not charged under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA became an Act as it was cleared by Parliament). In February 2003, the POTA was re-invoked against all the accused after the BJP retained control of the Gujarat legislature in the 2002 assembly elections.

In November 2003, the Supreme Court of India put a stay on the trial. In 2004, the POTA was repealed after the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) came to power, prompting it to review the invocation of the POTA against the accused. In May 2005, the POTA review commission decided not to charge the accused under POTA. This was later unsuccessfully challenged by a relative of the victim before the Gujarat High Court and later on appeal before Supreme Court. In September 2008, the Nanavati Commission submitted its report on the incident. In 2009, after accepting the report of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) appointed by it, the court appointed a special fast-track court to try the case along with 5 other fast track courts established to try the post-incident riots. The bench hearing the case also said that public prosecutors should be appointed in consultation with the SIT chairman. It ordered that the SIT would be the nodal agency for deciding about witness protection and also asked that it file supplementary charge sheets and that it may cancel the bail of the accused. More than 100 people were arrested in relation to the incident. The court was set up inside the Sabarmati Central Jail, where almost all of the accused were confined. The hearing began in May 2009. Additional Sessions Judge P R Patel was designated to hear the case.

In May 2010, Supreme Court restrained the trial courts from pronouncing judgement in nine sensitive riot cases, including Godhra train incident. The trial was completed in September 2010; however, the verdict could not be delivered because of the Supreme Court stay. The stay was lifted in January 2011 and the judge announced that he shall pronounce the judgement on 22 February 2011.

Court verdict
On February 2011, the trial court convicted 31 people and acquitted 63 others, saying the incident was a “pre-planned conspiracy". The convictions were based on the murder and conspiracy provisions of Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code respectively and under Sections 149, 307, 323, 324, 325, 326, 332, 395, 397, and 436 of the Code and some sections of the Railway Act and Police Act. The death penalty was awarded to 11 convicts; those believed to have been present at a meeting held the night before the incident where the conspiracy was formed, and those who,according to the court, had actually entered the coach and poured petrol before setting it afire. Twenty others were sentenced to life imprisonment.

Maulvi Saeed Umarji, who was believed by the SIT to be the prime conspirator, was acquitted along with 62 other accused for lack of evidence. The convicted filed appeals in the Gujarat High Court. The state government also challenged the trial court's decision to acquit 61 persons in the High Court and sought death sentences for 20 convicts awarded life imprisonment in the case.

Reactions to the verdict
BJP spokesperson Shahnawaz Hussain stated, "The theory propagated by the (central) government and some NGOs (Non-Governmental Organization) has been proved wrong...." Law Minister Veerappa Moily (a Congress Party member) said it was premature to comment and that the courts will take their own course. R. K. Raghavan, who was the head of the Special Investigating Team, said he was satisfied with the verdict. BJP spokesperson, Ravi Shankar Prasad said the verdict had exposed the nefarious designs of the UPA government which tried to cover up the entire episode.

Popular culture

 * Chand Bujh Gaya, a 2005 film, uses the Godhra train burning incident as the background for a love story.
 * The 2013 film Kai Po Che had the Gujarat riots as a backdrop for the main narrative. It was based on the novel The 3 Mistakes of My Life written by Chetan Bhagat.
 * The 2003 documentary Final Solution depicts the train burning and the Gujarat riots that followed.