User:Kavvyasharma/Withania somnifera/Pret1790 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing User:Kavvyasharma's work.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kavvyasharma/Withania_somnifera?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Withania somnifera
 * Withania somnifera

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hi Kavvyasharma! Here's my peer review for you:

Lead

 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, the lead has been updated. Kavvyasharma has updated the Lead "Traditional Medicine" with subheadings for General, Pharmacology and Anti Stress.

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the content added is relevant to the topic on Withania somnifera.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, the content is up-to-date. Kavvyasharma uses sources from 2014, 2015, 2019 and 2022. Although there is one older source from 2006.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, there is no content missing and all content does belong.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No, this article has no reference to these topics.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, the content added is neural as Kavvyasharma discussed Pharmacology for the plant, Withania somnifera.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No there are no claims that are biased towards a particular position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I believe all viewpoints are equally represented.

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all content is sourced with in-text citations and reliable sources.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Yes, all the content accurately reflects what the cited sources state. I was able to verify this through the in-text citations.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? While the sources do reflect available literature on the topic, there is one source that is outdated as it is from 2006.
 * Are the sources current? Majority of the sources are current as they are from 2014-2022, but one source is from 2006.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) The articles Kavvyasharma chose are peer-reviewed articles and do not include any random websites.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, all the links work.

Organization

 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, all the content added is well written. Kavvyasharma did a great job describing their topic using clear and concise language.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? After reviewing this article, there are no grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the content added is well-organized as Kavvyasharma broke down the sections into Traditional Medicine" with subheadings for General, Pharmacology and Anti Stress.

Overall impressions

 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, the article is more complete with the content Kavvyasharma added.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths of the content added is that it discusses Anti stress and Antimicrobial/ antifungal/ Antiparasitic effects for Withania somnifera. The current article does not include any information for this topic.
 * How can the content added be improved? I believe the content added can be improved through the use of images and media. Kavvyasharma's edit does not include any media or images.