User:KaydenPogia/Cirripectes vanderbilti/BlessedAni Peer Review

General info
Kayden Pogia
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:KaydenPogia/Cirripectes vanderbilti
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cirripectes vanderbilti

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? As I was reviewing, I really found interesting of the description of this animal. I really liked how this species sister lineage is Cirripectes matakaro. I also liked how this species was described in color, and specific length of this species.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)-The article tells me of what family group this species is in, as well as how this species has a sister lineage called Cirripectes matakaro.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? - Yes these subtitles do match with the information given in the article. For example the description part clearly describes this species with good information.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? The information given was definitely appropriate for each section. Additional information could be added for certain sections, and some of the sections have similar information. For example there are some descriptive information on the species that wasn't under the description section.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) The writing style is clear and understanding when I read the article.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? There are some that I have seen, but could add more in the future.
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? Yes there is a reference list that looks good and not made up.
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes each source is linked with a number
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? These sources look legit and looks like it can give additional information for this article.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? One change that I would probably make in this article is maybe just add a few more pictures of this species. However the information looks good so far, can't wait to see the rest later.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? I personally think it is getting there, however there could be more information for the species before it should go out to the world.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? The main thing is to add more information. I would think of adding the species habitat, how it lives, eats, the species they are like, and etc.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I could apply the feedback I gave to this article to mine as well because I feel like I need more information on my species as well. I also need to find better sources for myself to look into my species.