User:KaylaCarleton/Cadmium telluride photovoltaics/Mattwells5 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? KaylaCarleton
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:KaylaCarleton/Cadmium telluride photovoltaics

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation

 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The lead briefly touches on an environmental concern of recycling CdTe modules at the end of their life.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? The lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes Cadmium telluride photovoltaics and their relevance.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The lead does include a brief description of the articles major sections, such as rare materials used, and cell efficiency.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The lead talks about solar farms, but never really goes into detail about current solar farms, or expands on that lead.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I would say the lead is concise, it describes what the article is about and prepares the reader well for the information they are about to read.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the content is relevant to the topic, especially the recycling on rare and toxic materials after their life. The environmental impact is important to since even though they do have low carbon footprints, that does not mean they don't have negative environmental impacts. It good to represent both positive and negative impacts.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, the content is up to date with references including 2020 and 2018. Recycling and environmental impact are very important current topic when discussing energy solutions.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? One topic that may be interesting could be to include positive environmental impacts and how it compares with other PV cells or energy solutions.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes the article is written in a neutral way, where the information is presented in facts and potential impacts.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? This article is not biased, but it would be interesting to explore the positive impacts, or benefits to using this type of technology a bit more.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Both topic included are presented equally, neither is misrepresented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No the content does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position, it just presents unbiased information, including both positive and negative impacts.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, they all look to be reputable sources of information.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, the sources represent the two topic to be added into the article, the environmental and health issues, and the life cycle including the end phase.
 * Are the sources current? The sources are current, with some articles being from 2018 and 2020.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? I cannot find a link that works, they need to be updated.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the article is well written and easy to follow along. The sentences are written clearly and easy to follow.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There are no spelling or grammatical errors where i caught.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The content is well organized. The two proposed topics fit well with each other, and are good transition topics since they are both relevant to each other.

Images and Media N/A
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only N/A
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The content added improved the overall quality of the article because it includes topics which are very important when transitioning to PV technology, what happens at the end of their life cycle and where do they end up. This is an important topic when discussing sustainable energy alternative and its very important to realise that there are environmental impacts which need to be considered, even in more sustainable energy sources.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths of the content added, is that they are forward thinking topics which are important and need to be discussed when implementing or discussing PV technology.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think the content can be improved by comparing this type of PV technology to other PV alternatives or other energy alternatives.